Showing posts with label St. Louis Cardinals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label St. Louis Cardinals. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Catching Up

By The Common Man

A lot has happened over the last three week while The Common Man was trapped under a squishy and adorable baby, and TCM hasn’t had a chance to organize a real response to the news. So let’s just get through it all quickly so we can get back on track with our offseason, shall we?


---------------------------------------------------------------------

The Common Man has been fortunate to get to know a lot of Cardinals fans and writers over the last couple years, and he remains happy for them. Despite that, he takes no real joy in the Cardinals’ win. TCM just doesn’t think the team is terribly likable, between Albert Pujols’ silly refusal to talk to the media, Tony LaRussa’s paranoia and whining, Chris Carpenter’s yelling, Ryan Theriot’s healthy ego, and the way the club ran Colby Rasmus out of town. That said, what a great World Series. Congratulations are due to David Freese and Lance Berkman for their huge performances, and to Mike Napoli for proving what idiots the Angels were last offseason.

Friday, October 21, 2011

Certified Public Accountancy

By The Common Man

Last night, as Jason Wojciechowski pointed out, Albert Pujols made an incredibly poor defensive play that wound up costing the Cardinals what turned out to be the winning run. Misjudging a poor throw from John Jay, Pujols reacted late and allowed the ball to bounce off his glove rather than cutting the ball off cleanly and holding Elvis Andrus at first base.


After the game, as we learned this morning, Pujols was nowhere to be found in the locker room. Similarly, Yadier Molina, Matt Holliday and Lance Berkman were absent as well. Jeff Passan complained that Pujols’ decision to leave early showed “zero leadership” (which seems unfair, he could have led the other veterans out). Jon Paul Morosi similarly wrote, “The lack of accountability was inexcusable from a man who is frequently described as a good teammate — and will soon want to be paid like the greatest player in the game.”

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

World Series Prediction: A Nickname Face-Off

Once upon a time, The Common Man committed to objectively reviewing and grading all 30 of the nicknames of baseball's 30 teams.  He got eight done.  While he is committed to finishing the list this offseason, The Common Man did happen to review the nicknames for both Texas and St. Louis, and on the basis of those reviews, he is confident he can predict the outcome of the 2011 World Series. How will it go when the Rangers meet the Cardinals?  Re-printed below are TCM's nickname reviews for each squad.  Predictions at the end.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Adam Wainwright and the Cardinals' Playoff Hopes

By The Common Man

Today’s shocking news out of Cardinals camp, broken by Derrick Goold of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, that ace Adam Wainwright likely has a “significant injury” and is possibly facing Tommy John surgery, is a huge blow to the Cardinals playoff chances for several reasons.


One reason is that the Cardinals were not that far out in front of their competition. Both Dan Szymborski’s ZiPS system and Baseball Prospectus were high on the Cards, predicting them to win the NL Central by a handful of games each. So any major injury to one of the big four (Carpenter, Wainwright, Pujols, and Holliday) was sure to put the Cardinals behind the 8-ball. And no one in the NL Central is likely to challenge for the Wild Card. So there’s little doubt the Cardinals playoff odds just took a big hit.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

3 Questions: St. Louis Cardinals

By The Common Man

Just landed back in America's Frozen Heartland after a little less than a week in the desert of Scottsdale (soon to be rename Klawtonia).  Lots of stuff burning in TCM's bloggy brain, but he owes the St. Louis Cardinals answers to these questions three.

The Cards remain a team driven by a few, exceptionally strong, personalities and focused around a small number of, incredibly important questions. The future of the franchise seems to hang in the balance of the answers to these questions far more than other teams. As always, you can read previous 3 Questions entries here.


Question 1: Will Albert Pujols sign a contract extension?

Albert Pujols, who is already (at just 30 years old) one of the three best first basemen of all time, is going to make just $16 million in 2011 and is one of the biggest values in baseball. That won’t be the case next season, as Pujols is currently on track to become a free agent. To keep their superstar, the Cardinals are going to have to pony up with some big money. As in A-Rod money. And that’s probably just a starting point (in a world where Jason Werth can get $126 million over 7 years). Though Pujols has had nagging injuries to his shoulder and heel (though he’s averaged 156 games per season), he has posted an OPS below 1.000 just twice in his 10 seasons, in 2007 and 2002, and has never had an OPS+ below 150. He has a Rookie of the Year trophy, six Silver Sluggers, two gold gloves, three MVP awards, and (perhaps most amazingly) has never finished out of the top 10 in MVP voting. And, again, he’s only 30. He is, in short, a dynamo.

Retaining their franchise player is the Cardinals number one priority for the next year. Albert has set a deadline to get a deal done at the start of Spring Training. Chances are that it happens.  For one thing, the Cards are already huddling with Pujols' agent.  (can you picture Pujols going elsewhere? TCM can’t), and if not GM John Mozeliak is sure to be seeking employment elsewhere before long. If you had to pick one player to be worth an eight or nine year deal at this point, isn’t Pujols that guy? However, the length and cost of Pujols’ new deal will have ramifications across the St. Louis organization as they try to compete in coming years with less money for supporting players.

Question 2: Can Tony LaRussa and Cody Rasmus co-exist and does Tony LaRussa have a problem with young players?

These are related questions, so TCM will fold them together.

At the tail end of his tenure in Minnesota, long time manager Tom Kelly was hurting his team as much as his experience helped it. Perhaps even moreso. Handed veteran rosters to start his managerial career, Kelly never really seemed to warm up to young players, and found innumerable ways to tear down rookies. He hated Todd Walker’s defense. He wanted Marty Cordova to stop pulling the ball. He exiled David Ortiz, Torii Hunter, and Doug Mientkiewicz to the minors for more almost a full season each. Meanwhile, he made sure that mediocrities like Ron Coomer, Denny Hocking, and Pat Meares had plenty of playing time. In the end, Kelly seemed to realize that his own predispositions were holding back the Twins and he stepped aside in favor of Ron Gardenhire, under whom the Twins have flourished.

Is something similar happening in St. Louis? It’s hard to say. LaRussa placed a lot of trust in 23 year old Jaime Garcia in 2010, and showed a ridiculous amount of faith in 25 year old rookie Jon Jay despite a choppy minor league track record. But TLR’s relationship with 23 year old phenom Cody Rasmus seems to be poisonous. Last year, LaRussa may or may not have been benching Rasmus. LaRussa definitely seemed to have problems with his young centerfielder seeking advice from his father on his hitting. And Rasmus definitely felt so persecuted by his manager that he requested a trade. Whether or not Rasmus’ feelings were justified is certainly debatable. He’s earning a reputation as uncoachable and a bad teammate (and his dad isn't helping matters), such that even Prince Albert wanted him shipped out of town last year.

The Cardinals need cheap young talent like Rasmus to build around big stars like Pujols (especially as his price tag soars), Holliday, Carpenter, and Wainwright. Perhaps no other team in baseball boasts a big four that big. But four players won’t win a World Championship if that’s all a team can afford to pay.

Question 3: How will the big switch from defense to offense go over?

The Cardinals have made a big show this offseason of deemphasizing defense on their team, despite what their GM thinks. Slick-fielding SS Brendan Ryan is gone, making way for the adequate, but unspectacular, Ryan Theriot. And Lance Berkman, who TCM previously assumed had been set in concrete around the first base area, is allegedly going to “patrol” leftfield (presumably like the US “patrols” the Canadian border, by staying in booths along major roadways).

This is particularly odd, given the probable payroll restrictions the team is likely to have moving forward. Offense, after all, is still expensive to acquire in free agency (how else does Lance Berkman get $8 million guaranteed?) and in arbitration. Meanwhile, defense is still relatively inexpensive. If the team continues down this road, look for victories to get more and more expensive, and thus harder and harder to come by for the Redbirds, especially if they continue to compromise infield defense in front of a very groundball heavy pitching staff.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Prince Albert and the Crown...Again

It was about a year and a week ago that I wrote that Albert Pujols had the best chance at a triple crown that we'd seen in a very long time. I did a few little quick-and-dirty things to try to gauge how plausible it was, and later in the day, David Pinto chimed in with his real-life math and determined that his chances were actually even quite a bit better than I would've thought.

Well, it didn't happen, of course. But it was fun to follow along while it lasted. And he did lead the league in OBP and SLG, which is really a lot more important in terms of runs and wins, but it's just not the same, is it? I don't care about batting average or RBI -- or even home run totals, really -- but I really want to see another triple crown winner at some point. It would just be cool.

Last year, though, Pujols was on fire right out of the gate, hitting around .340 in the first two months and his 30th homer by the end of June. This season he had just 18 homers on the same date, and his batting average hit a low of .295 as late as July 30. There have been debates over whether Pujols was on the decline, and whether he was even the greatest player in baseball anymore.

Well, don't look now, but he's actually in an even better position to win the triple crown than he was a year ago.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

The New Podcast is Here! The New Podcast is Here!

By The Common Man

All in all, it was an incredibly busy and successful day yesterday in the life of this new little venture. The blog had its highest day of traffic in its history, and the response from you all has been terrific. Please know that we are working on a couple of small technical issues, but that we are focused on continuing to provide you with excellent content in the meantime, and to earn our keep here on The Sweetspot Network.

Because of yesterday’s big craziness, which included the big rollout and a podcast, TCM is going to take it easy today with some links and some brief observations throughout the day.

First up, did someone say podcast? Indeed, last night, The Common Man was joined by his partner BILL and by Lar of Wezenball to talk some baseball. And thank God, because with the Twins losing 6-1, TCM didn’t have the stomach to watch anymore. The topics of conversation ranged far and wide, beginning with a brief recap Lar’s trip to the SABR Convention in Atlanta before getting down to the serious business of the Don Wakamatsu firing and what’s wrong with the Mariners (and who’s to blame). We also discussed which teams that are out of contention this year are likely to bounce back strong in 2011, and which contenders may fall back. And just before briefly touching on the basebrawl between the Reds and Cardinals, we also discussed A-Rod hitting 600, Derek Jeter passing Babe Ruth, and how and why the conceptions of what constitutes a “milestone” may be changing. Give us a listen:

Listen to internet radio with TheCommonMan on Blog Talk Radio

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Random Thursday: 1921 and Austin McHenry

Sometimes, on select Thursdays, randomness happens. This is one of those Thursdays. From Happy Foreman, the last subject of Random Thursday, The Common Man used the random feature of Baseball Reference.com to jump to a neutralized batting register from 1921. The list itself wasn’t terribly interesting or revealing. It confirmed some things we already knew, that Rogers Hornsby, Harry Heilmann, Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker, and Babe Ruth were pretty awesome. Frankie Frisch was one of the most valuable 22 year olds ever (playing 153 games, hitting .341 with a 128 OPS+, and leading the NL with 49 SB).

But one name did pop out high on the leader boards. He was 7th in batting average (.339) and slugging percentage (.513). His 894 neutralized OPS was 8th in the majors. His real stats on the year, the unneutralized ones, are even more impressive. He played 152 games and registered 201 hits. He had 37 doubles, 8 triples, and 17 homeruns. He scored 92 runs and drove in 102. He hit .350/.393/.531 for a 145 OPS+. He was just 25 years old. And The Common Man had never heard of him. His name was Austin McHenry.

Alas, McHenry’s career would end less than a year after his breakthrough campaign. McHenry struggled out of the gate in 1922, eventually alarming Cardinals’ manager Branch Rickey because he was having a hard time with fly balls in leftfield. McHenry reportedly told his manager, “I feel alright, but I can’t see. I don’t know what it is. Maybe I’m going blind.” Rickey ordered McHenry home to recuperate in late June. McHenry tried to come back a month later, but was simply not right. Rickey told reporters,

“He was pitiful. We were leading, 2-1, in the seventh inning when the Giants put two on with two out. Kelly hit a fly towards left field. Mac had only about 10 feet to cover. He put out his hands, but the ball was over his head by 15 feet. Coming in to the bench Mac put his head on my knees and cried….I sent him out the next day because I didn’t want to check his confidence….At the plate he swung at balls over his head. With almost a blind swing he touched two. When he misjudged a fly in that game I was convinced that he had not recovered.”


McHenry was essentially done as a major leaguer. His vision problems were caused by a fast-moving and aggressive brain tumor that proved to be inoperable. The malignancy was pressing on his optic nerve and was, indeed, causing him to go blind. McHenry died of his tumor on November 27 of 1922 at just 27 years old, leaving behind a wife and daughter. Mike Lynch has written a terrific biography of McHenry for Seamheads.com that The Common Man heartily recommends.

In retrospect, it’s unclear whether McHenry really was poised to be a superstar in the National League. His 1921 season aside, McHenry was a relatively pedestrian leftfielder. He was an above average hitter, but probably was only passable at best as a defensive outfielder. The only season in which he finished with more than 2.0 WAR was his epic 1921, which, at 4.9 wins above replacement, was good but in no way historic. A good comparison might be Darin Erstad, whose excellent 2000 earned him a reputation as a great hitter, despite never reaching similar heights again. Erstad was able to parlay that season into a huge contract and several more years in the game, and was even haunting the Houston Astros bench as recently as last year.

Nevertheless, McHenry was beloved by St. Louis fans, who mourned his passing. His replacements for the Cardinals were simply not adequate in a high offense era. None could match McHenry’s power. Max Flack and Joe Schulz, the primary beneficiaries of extra playing time, hit .300 but could barely get the ball out of the infield. In 1923, Rickey dealt 1B Jack Fournier to Brooklyn for Hi Meyers, who proved a bust. The club would essentially play an outfielder short until Chick Hafey blossomed in 1925, and the club sputtered to the middle of the pack in the National League.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

MLB Nickname Review: St. Louis Cardinal

This past weekend, The Common Man was inspired by an NPR story of two intrepid bloggers with a book coming out, who were handing out letter grades to animals. Jacob Lentz and Andrew Nash brilliantly decided, probably over a lot of alcohol, that the really cool animals were not getting their due, and that someone should take to objectively assessing the performance of each species. So they created Animal Review. For those wondering, pandas, Africanized killer bees, and alpacas get an F. King cobras, great white sharks, and sloths get an A. It seems fair.

The Common Man thinks it’s important that everything get objectively graded, which is why he’s beginning a series of articles grading your team’s mascots/nickname. Frankly, some of you deserve to be taken down a peg or two (I’m looking at you, Red Sox Nation!), and some of you deserve to be rewarded in the face of your great suffering (Pirates…well, not nation…Guy). So in honor of the inspiration for this new series of articles, The Common Man will begin with the only team nickname/mascot that the budding minds over at Animal Review have looked at thusfar: the Cardinals.



First, some basic stats:

Name: St. Louis
Nickname: Cardinals
NicknameTypology: Bird
Color: Red
Size: 20-23 cm, ~45 grams
Special abilities: Flight, Singing, Being Easy to Spot (males only)


Best thing about the Cardinal: The bird is fiercely territorial. According to Animal Review, it “will even attack its own reflection in a mirror.” That equals a massive homefield advantage, Cardinal fans!

Worst thing about the Cardinal: Apparently kind of dumb. It is attacking itself in a mirror, after all.

More good news: Not only are Cardinals fiercely territorial, but they are non-migratory. In fact, as Animal Review reminds us, they rarely stray far from where they were born. Also, they mate for life and are monogamous. Those tidbits are welcome information for Albert Pujols fans who would like to see Prince Albert stay in red.

Also, they have a terrific singing voice, as part of its flashy attempt to pull in a mate. Flying is never not cool. Finally, the sale of cardinals as pets is banned thanks to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (despite the fact that it’s non-migratory, but whatever), which means THIS BIRD CANNOT BE CAGED!

On the other hand: It’s awfully small. I mean, 45 grams isn’t a lot. And it’s not very aggressive toward non-Cardinals. Given this, TCM is surprised the Whitey Herzog clubs stole as many bases as they did. Frankly, they’re not very scary. Sure, sparrows are small too, but they divebomb the hell out of The Common Man when he rides his lawnmower, and even useless birds like pigeons and seagulls might poop on you as they fly by. The Cardinal is just kind of pretty. Also, that territorialism could lead to some clubhouse friction.

Final analysis: Cardinals are all right. They are generally beloved because they’re pretty and they sound nice. And they have some really nice qualities that baseball fans look for. They’re very loyal, after all; and that’s nice in an era of free agency. Also, cardinals are very popular. The Arizona Cardinals play in the NFL, there are lots of colleges (including Ball State!) that use them as mascots. Also, seven states have adopted them as the state bird. That said, they just aren’t very exciting as a mascot. Nobody is going to be intimidated by a cardinal, unless he’s wearing a football helmet. And even then, they’re only threatening once every 20-30 years. They simply aren’t very tough. Instead, fans of the cardinal are going to stare politely at it through binoculars and leave food out, hoping to entice them to return.
They’re nice, but not awesome. Like our new friends at Animal Review, The Common Man is forced to give the Cardinals a B- for a nice effort but meh execution.

Update: The Common Man's second nickname review, for the Toronto Blue Jays, is up here.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

A Half-Hour With Howard Nunn

On Thursday, The Common Man hinted that he wasn’t done talking about Howie Nunn, the relief pitcher who toiled for three seasons for the Cardinals, Reds, and Mets in the late 1950s and early ‘60s. Curious about the abrupt end of Mr. Nunn’s career and the lack of details surrounding his time in the big leagues, The Common Man contacted Mr. Nunn and he graciously agreed to be interviewed about his career. Howard Nunn is 73 years old, retired, and currently living in North Carolina, just a few minutes from his hometown. He was very generous with his time and very patient, as he endured some technical difficulties on The Common Man’s end. What follows is an edited transcript of the conversation:

TCM: First, Mr. Nunn, thank you very much for the agreeing to speak with me today, I greatly appreciate it. First thing, I would want to know more about the kind of pitcher you were. Can you describe what you threw and, if you were telling someone how you saw yourself as a pitcher, what would you say?

HN: Well, I was a fastball pitcher, and I threw the slider and I threw a knuckleball occasionally. Basically, the sinking fastball was my best pitch. I don’t know, we didn’t have any guns to tell you what the speed was. They would give you an estimate of speed. But as far as today, they’ll tell you how fast a guy is throwing in a heartbeat.

TCM: You were primarily a reliever. In the minors did you start?

HN: I mostly relieved. Well, I only relieved in the big leagues, except for one exhibition game I did start. That was against Cleveland in 1962. We won that game 6-2 and I went 9 innings.

TCM: I’m interested in your knuckler, is that something you came up with or that you developed later?

HN: It’s just something I played around with in semi-pro ball, as a kid, I’d just throw one occasionally. But it was not really a pitch you could rely on, because I never learned to control it. I’d throw it occasionally to a batter just to show it, but I never got hurt or helped by it too much.

TCM: So in 1954 you were signed by the Cardinals. Do you remember the name of the scout who signed you?

HN: George Furrel [not sure of the spelling here]. He was one of the Furrel boys from Greensborough. I can’t think of all of their names. There were three brothers who all played pro ball. And George was scouting for the Cardinals when he signed me. Big bonus. Nineteen and fifty-three, I was seventeen and I graduated from high school. And I signed in September of that year, but of course I didn’t have to report until the spring of ’54. That was back when they paid big bonuses. $500. It’s ridiculous. It wasn’t even a token payment, but that’s what it was.

TCM: So you spent five years in the minor leagues with the Cardinals, and then in 1959 you debuted with them. How did you get the news they were calling you up?

HN: Well, they sent me a contract. I guess it was in the ’57 or ’58 season, I think this is right, I was with Houston in the Texas League and had decent years there. I don’t know whether they were protecting me or whatever, but they called me up and I went to Spring Training. And they were impressed with me enough that I stayed with the club. And in ’59 I won back-to-back games in relief. Could have won the third game, on the third day in a row in relief. But I came in and Ernie Banks was the batter. He hit a ground ball single. It was a ground ball between short and third that went to left field for a base hit. I had won two games on the previous two days before that. If I had gotten out of that I would have won three in a row. [note: This occurred on May 6, 7, and 8 of 1959. Nunn did win games on consecutive days, but entered the third game with the bases loaded and one out (it looks like manager Solly Hemus really liked to ride the hot hand). Play-by-play data on baseballreference.com shows that he walked Randy “Handsome Ransom” Jackson to bring in the run before getting Big George Altman to ground into a double play.]

TCM: Now you were called up that year and you played with another rookie, Bob Gibson.

HN: Yes, he and I talked a lot. Gibby was real tempermental. He was a keen guy, and that’s why he became such a great pitcher. He was like, I don’t know, he might have had one win in five or six. I don’t know. But he was not having a good year. [note: Gibson was 3-5 that year with a 3.33 ERA, but started slowly, giving up three runs in 2.2 innings in the first half of the season.] He was having a horrible time, saying, “Send me back to Omaha; I’m tired of this.” But they never did; they weren’t stupid enough to give up on him.

TCM: Well that seemed to work out okay for him.

HN: He was a real, real competitor, and he was nice guy. I haven’t talked to him in a while. He was moody, real moody, but when he crossed that line and on the mound he was strictly business.

TCM: You also played with a couple of other all time greats that year, and one player who is particularly revered by today’s players, Curt Flood.

HN: Yes, I knew Curt. He was the centerfielder there. After the Cardinals sent me out, there was a lot of controversy with Curt. But he made baseball better for the people playing it. It gave them a little leeway. Because these owners were butchering the ballplayers money-wise. But of course what it is today is ridiculous.

TCM: You also played that year with another all-time great at the end of his career, Stan Musial.

HN: One of the greatest men who ever played the game. A perfect gentleman. You could be a rookie, but he was just as nice to you as if you were a season veteran. And he was a great one, a natural hitter. He could hit the ball.

TCM: In 1961, your contract was purchased by the Cincinnati Reds. Did you make that team out of Spring Training then?

HN: Oh yes, I went straight on in. Matter of fact, I pitched in relief, as usual, in Philadelphia. That was on a Sunday afternoon, I went seven and two-thirds innings in relief of Jim Maloney. He was real wild that day. I came in with the bases loaded in one out. And Bobby Del Greco hit into a double play. And I pitched seven and two-thirds innings in that game, and the most I had pitched in that year was like two or three innings. [Note: this was on June 18, and Mr. Nunn’s recollection is spot on.]

Anyway, we went on back to Cincinnati for an off day on Monday, and played, I think, the Cardinals when they came in on Tuesday. And I was up throwing after pitching seven and two-thirds innings. Didn’t get in the game, but the next day I relieved against the Cardinals. No problem. But then the Dodgers were coming in and I relieved against them. I was into my second inning against the Dodgers in like the fifth inning, and I had two strikes and no balls on Frank Howard and left loose with a hard slider that was like a knife that went straight through my elbow. The next pitch I threw I barely reached home plate, and Frank Howard struck out. And I walked off the mound and into the dugout and my arm just felt exactly dead. It was just like it had no feeling in it. And they said I had tore something apparently inside the elbow. And that was before arthroscopic surgery and all these things that they have today. [Note: Mr. Nunn’s recollection here is pretty solid. He did strike out Frank Howard that last inning (looking), but he also faced Norm Sherry, Ron Perranoski, and Maury Wills to close out the inning (an incredibly impressive feat, given that he had just shredded his elbow.] So I went on from there and that season they put me on the disabled list. And I stayed the rest of the season and played the Yankees in the World Series. I was there in uniform, but I wasn’t eligible because I wasn’t on the active roster. I was disabled.

But then that winter, the Reds sold my contract to the New York Mets in their first year in existence. The sad thing about it was that I had a piece of paper where they signed me with no conditions and I was outright to the Mets. And I went to Spring Training with them. And I was unaware that I was on a “look-see” basis. I think the draft price was $25,000 if they took a man off the roster. But the Mets told me that in Spring Training… As a matter of fact, the first ballgame that the Mets ever played was against the New York Yankees exhibition game in Spring Training, and I was the winning pitcher. Roger Craig started the game and I relieved in the eighth inning or ninth inning and later on we won in 11 innings, 4-3. And that was the first time the Mets ever played. Then they turned around at the end of Spring Training, they called me into the office and said, “You’re going back to Cincinnati.” I said, “What do you mean I’m going back to Cincinnati?” “Well, you were on a ‘look-see basis.’” They would have had to pay $75,000 to keep my contract, and they felt it was too big a risk. And all the while I thought I was a member of the Mets, but actually I was on a “look-see basis.” If they did it today, well, a man can live fairly well off the income, you could probably sue ‘em for it, the way the game is covered up today. [Note: Baseball Reference.com says that on December 21, 1961, “The New York Mets purchased Howie Nunn from the Cincinnati Reds.” On April 2, 1962, it says that the Mets “returned” Nunn and two other players to their respective teams “following a previous purchase.” Perhaps these were deals conditional on the players breaking camp with the big club, but they do not seem to be part of the initial expansion draft.]

In 1960, the Reds finished 67-87 and 6th in the National League. But in 1961, your team surprised everyone and, not only competed, but won the National League Pennant. Were your teammates surprised at that success? Were you surprised at that success? [Note: Here, there were some technical difficulties, and Mr. Nunn was not able to hear my exact question. His answer, however, is an important reminder that Cuba was still open in 1960, and American ballplayers were still playing there. Also, his answer hints at the power dynamics between players and ownership and management at that point.]

Well yes. The previous year, in 1960, I pitched in Havana, Cuba, and they moved the club to Jersey City. And I had had a tremendous year, like a 1.91 earned run average, about 12-6. I had had a real good season. But you know, you go in [to Spring Training] on a “look-see basis” and they look to see what they can use, kind of like an old horse. They take what they need and put the rest out to pasture. But that’s a long time ago.


TCM: In 1961 and 1962, your manager was Fred Hutchinson.

HN: One of the greatest men I ever knew. But he would fight you in a heartbeat. A good manager.

TCM: And in 1962, during Spring Training, you were with the Mets, and you would have been managed by Casey Stengel, wouldn’t you?

HN: Stengel. Cookie Lavagetto was a coach. Red Ruffing was the pitching coach. Rogers Hornsby was the batting instructor. Stengel was the manager.

TCM: Did you have much contact with Casey? What did you think of him?

HN: Sure. I went in to ask him why I was pitching any more than was. And the next thing I know he’s talking about the cutoff play from the outfield, how the outfielders and infielders had to work together to hit the cutoff man. I just walked out of the office. He was talkin’ that Stengelese, and I couldn’t understand. He never answered a question. He just talked around everything.

TCM: Your major league career ended in 1962 and you were only 26 years old. Did you stay in the game after that? Where did you go?

HN: I tried to stay on but the arm wouldn’t do it. I still had the fastball, but I couldn’t throw a breaking pitch or anything. It would blow out the elbow or it would just pop right out like you hit it with a sledgehammer. I went down to Macon, Georgia, Double-A ball. I relieved down there for a while. But it got so I wasn’t throwing well, and I decided to give it up.

TCM: Was that a hard decision for you to make?

HN: Not really. When you can’t excel or can’t do anything that is half of what your capabilities are, you have to let it go.

TCM: What did you do after you were done with the game?

HN: I did shop work for 43 years. I was the plant manager. But I finally gave that up and have been retired for about five years.


The Common Man wishes he had had more time (and stronger interviewing skills) to really delve into more of these topics with Mr. Nunn. In particular, exploring the labor relations of that day, why Fred Hutchinson was so special to him, and discussing his experiences with the Reds in more detail. But The Common Man took up a great deal of Mr. Nunn’s time on a Saturday morning, and is just pleased to have learned as much as he did. Great thanks to Howard Nunn for all his help.

The Common Man plans to make this a semi-regular feature here, interviewing players who are available and willing to talk about their time in the big leagues. If you have any requests, The Common Man is more than willing to take them.